Us Home
 
VISION, MISSION  
 
OUR HISTORY  
 
DONATE  
 
FINANCIAL AID  
 
BOARD DIRECTORS  
Bill Chalmers  
Steve Davis  
Rick Jackson  
Laurie Kelley  
Connie Munro  
Linda Nicholls  
David Raithby  
Dave Tyler  
Director Meetings  
Jan. 10 '05 Minutes

Directors Private  
 
ORG INFO  
 
TESTIMONIALS  
 
Back to Directors Meetings List   |    No Agenda for this meeting
Jan. 10, 2005 Board of Directors Meeting Minutes


Minutes for Haven Foundation Board Meeting

Via Email dated Jan 10, 2005

 

Hello all,

I have tallied the votes and both Motions are passed.

Carole would you please file this in the appropriate location.

Paul

----- Original Message -----

From: Connie Munro

To: Laurie Kelley ; Paul Robillard

Cc: Mark Gunderson ; Dick Sass ; David Raithby and Sandey McCartney ; Gerry Owen ; globalc@uvic.ca ; lindalee@haven.ca ; Randy Wong ; Carole Ames ; Ernie & Cathy McNally

Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:03 PM

Subject: Re: MOTION TO APPROVE

 

I have added my vote to the tally. Connie

----- Original Message -----

From: Laurie Kelley

To: Paul Robillard

Cc: Mark Gunderson ; Dick Sass ; David Raithby and Sandey McCartney ; Connie Munro ; Gerry Owen ; globalc@uvic.ca ; lindalee@haven.ca ; Randy Wong ; Carole Ames ; Ernie & Cathy McNally

Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 1:26 PM

Subject: Re: MOTION TO APPROVE

 


On 9-Jan-05, at 12:23 PM, Paul Robillard wrote:

Hello Haven Board,


I am forwarding David's motion to approve the requests from Cathy and Ernie's included in this email;


And another for Dick to negotiate a contract with Bill Chalmers for our retreat:


Motions.


1. That the Haven Board approve the following three components of the 2005 Budget:  1. Wage increases, 2. Initiating marketing plans, and 3. Specific January Capital Expenditures, as detailed in the e-mail below.


Moved: David Raithby
Seconded: Paul Robillard
In favour: : Paul; Laurie Kelley, Connie Munro;Mark;Dick;David

Opposed: :
  
2.That Dick Sass negotiate a satisfactory contract with Bill Chalmers to facilitate our weekend of February 19-20, 2005:


Moved: Paul Robillard

Seconded : Laurie Kelley
In favour: : Laurie Kelley, Connie Munro;Paul;Mark Dick

Opposed: :

 
----- Original Message -----


From: Dick Sass
To: Cathy & Ernie McNally ; Mark Gunderson ; Paul Robillard ; David & Sandey Raithby ; Laurie Kelley ; connie@peterjoyes.com ; Linda Nicholls ; Rick Jackson ; Randy Wong ; Gerald Owen ; ronald.v.adkins@aexp.com ; bryancroeni@sbcglobal.ney
Cc: Carole Ames
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: Request for approval


Dear Haven Foundation Board,

I would like to call a telephone board meeting for 9AM Wednesday January 12 to handle these requests.   For anyone not able to attend, please so indicate and provide your comments and VOTE next to each item.   I think we can handle these items as submitted by Ernie and Cathy with a 15-30 minute teleconference board meeting.

Please let me know if you are available and I will have Carole Ames again send out teleconference CALL IN instructions so that we can all conference at the same time.   Those of us that are on gabriola can convene in the Whitaker Room at 9AM sharp and confer from there.

Regards.
Dick
At 04:49 PM 1/7/2005, Cathy & Ernie McNally wrote:

To Board of Directors Haven Foundation,

We understand approval of the 2005 Budget is on the agenda for the February Board Meeting.  We are writing to request the immediate approval of three components of the 2005 Budget:
• Wage increases
• Initiating Marketing plans
• Specific January Capital Expenditures

We, management, are forging ahead with our growth plans for 2005 and need to have the authority to immediately begin spending in certain areas that we believe are critical to us meeting our projected growth for 2005.  The entire budget has been revised and submitted to the Audit Committee for review.  Delaying the following requests to the February Board meeting will have negative consequences for the business. The details for these items are:

Wages
Wages increase for 35 staff members (detail attached). This $33,000 overall increase in our wage budget of $630,000, was included in the first draft of the 2005 Budget.  Since then, we have decreased the overall wage budget with a $16,000 productivity gain in housekeeping to help offset the wage increase, this will show up in the revised Budget. This results in a net increase of only $17,000 over 2004 wage costs.

Most employees have not had an increase for nearly two years.  This increase moves the average hourly wage from $10.09 per hour to $10.68 per hour averaging a $0.58 per hour wage increase to 29 staff members.  For the five salaried Supervisor staff the average salary will increase by $132 per month to $2488 per month.

Most importantly this wage increase is in support of our overall business strategy to increase the level of customer service, rates and margins for the business.  This fits in our ongoing plan to help replace the overwhelming customer appeal of Ben and Jock, which of course we don’t have any longer, with improved service at all levels.  We believe that with the withdrawal of B&J, and without this service quality combined with our marketing initiatives, the business would have experienced a 15-20% ($275,000) decline in revenue rather than the flat revenue curve and significant pricing improvements achieved to date. Our new customer (Come Alive) flow has been steady and slowly growing, and the first impressions of our “quality service” are helping sustain this.

More support for the wage increase:

1.  These are all merit increases, arrived at after reviewing each person's performance, attitude, and skills.  Though they have not asked directly for any increases, we know from discussions with staff that morale will suffer if we do not give this small raise.  As committed as they have been over the past 3 years, we think some might begin looking for other employment that may appear to offer more stability and growth/advancement opportunities.  We firmly believe that we may lose as many as 8 key personnel in the next year if we do not recognize their efforts and demonstrate some fiscal health and stability with this raise.  Our experience and statistics show that when a person leaves this has a direct cost of 30% of annual wages in retraining and lost productivity.  This is 8 people x 30% x $20,000 = $48,000 cost.  Conversely, the return for an employer on an employee with 3 years continuous employment (due to the intangible of their experience and relationship with customers) is an exponential curve of 110% of their salary, increasing to 150% after 5 years.  ALL of our key people with the exception of Reagan (2 years) are entering at least their third year.

2.  Our average wage rate is just at the official Canadian poverty level of $10.70 per hour.  To replace the people that leave with people of equivalent skills will require us offering at least the 2005 increased wage amount to attract the quality of personnel we need.  Doing nothing would achieve little wage savings and significant costs.

3.  If we were faced with dealing with low morale and lost personnel, we would personally need to reallocate at least 20% of our time away from the direct marketing and operational growth initiatives planned for 2005­which would almost definitely result in lower than forecast revenues for 2005.

 


Marketing
We need to continue with our marketing plans (detail attached) that were started and approved in 2004.  This includes Jonathan Diderich and the associated promotional budget.  Jonathan’s $48,000 salary and associated promotion costs of $15,000, for a total of $63,000, are a significant portion of the increase over the 2004 Budget.  These are long range initiatives that will impact revenues for this year and subsequent years.

Our targets for this initiative are revenue increases of $200,000 for each of 2005 and 2006 and $250,000 in 2007.

Capital Expenditures
• NewComputer.  Our Systems Manager’s computer is crashing on a daily basis and needs to be replaced urgently $1000
• Shop Saw.  Old one won’t cut it any more! $500
• Off season shower installation for Room 155 (see note below) $4500
TOTAL: $6,000

Note: Shower installation is the final step in making this a revenue generating room.  (previously used for meetings only)  Increased revenue by adding this new waterview room to our inventory will be:

60 nights x $128 (Summer peak rate) = $7,680 per year
140 nights x $22 (average upgrade from Premium room) = $3,080

Total = $10,760

We appreciate your attention to this request.

With care,
Ernie and Cathy

Minutes Approved:    February 18, 2005

 

Printable versions of these minutes:
     BoardMinutesJan10_05   .pdf   .doc   


Back to Directors Meetings List   |    No Agenda for this meeting

 

 

Home | Institute | Foundation | Resort | Conferences | Store | Us

© 2002. All rights reserved, The Haven